PattersonFarmPreservation.com 

Dedicated to perpetually preserving the Thomas S. & Alice E. Patterson Farm in Yardley, Bucks County, PA.
 An historic treasure. A sustainable resource for locally grown food. A place of pristine natural beauty.

 Celebrating and continuing the Patterson Farms' agrarian heritage of over 325 years.

(At  left and bottom of page) The magnificent
 Patterson Farm in Lower Makefield Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. It's fertile farmland was assessed by the USDA to be some of Pennsylvania's finest,  being composed of "Soils of Statewide Importance" and "Prime Farmland."
 

Less than a dozen years after the death of a lifelong Bucks County farmer and  his wife,  the township who condemned the beautiful farm the couple sought to preserve, has subdivided it and plans to sell off a parcel and bring development to its fertile farm fields.

Please help stop the dismantling of the Patterson Farm.

HOW YOU CAN HELP

Please tell Lower Makefield township supervisors and the township manager 
that you  SUPPORT PERMANENT FARMLAND PRESERVATION AND OPPOSE SELLING OR 
DEVELOPING ANY PART OF THE FARM.
  

Call the township at:
267-274-1100


Send emails to
township supervisors at:
pstainthorpe@lmt.org, dmclaughlin@lmt.org, ddobson@lmt.org ktyler@lmt.org
and Township Manager:
tfedor@lmt.org

Supervisor Benedetto is the only supervisor  to SUPPORT the Patterson Farm Preservation effort. 
Please THANK him!
jbenedetto@lmt.org

------------------------------------------------

Join our mailing list / email list. Send your contact information to
Admin@PattersonFarmPreservation.com

Leave a comment
 on our
Guest Book page.
--------------------------------
 
Send a Letter of Support to
Admin@PattersonFarmPreservation.com
. Or email to volunteer your time and talent.

------------------------------------------------

 On August 23, 1785 THOMAS JEFFERSON, our Founding Father and an avid farmer, stated to John Jay,

"Cultivators of the earth are the most valuable citizens. They are the most vigorous, the most independant, the most virtuous, and they are tied to their country and wedded to its liberty and interests by the most lasting bands. As long, therefore, as they can find employment in this line, I would not convert them into mariners, artisans, or
anything else."

The greatest fine art of the future will be the making of a comfortable living from a small piece of land. 
 - Abraham Lincoln.

Let us not forget that the cultivation of the earth is the most important labor of man.  Where tillage begins, other arts will follow.  The farmers,
therefore, are the founders of civilization. - Daniel Webster

I think our governments will remain virtuous for many centuries, as long as they are chiefly agricultural. - Thomas Jefferson

We do not inherit the land from our forefathers, we borrow it from our grandchildren. - Chief Seattle

As each of you has received a gift (a gracious divine endowment), employ it for one another as (befits) good trustee's of God's many sided grace. - 1 Peter 4:10


Farm Facts
$483,581.09 -  Payment received by Lower Makefield Township for Patterson acreage  from PennDot for construction of Interstate-95 exit loop. If managed wisely, employing a prudent preventive maintenance plan,  those funds could have preserved Patterson Farm for a very long time.
234
- Number of acres of Patterson farmland when Lower Makefield township took possession from farmers, Thomas & Alice Patterson.
213 - 
Acres remaining of Patterson Farm today.
6 - Percent of farms within a 100 mile radius of Philadelphia that grow vegetables.
2 - Acres of American farm & ranchland are lost to development every minute.
1
- Percent of the American population who are the farmers who feed us.

With your help we will achieve success using a conservation easement, grants, donations from the community and income from the farm.

NOW is the time to permanently preserve Patterson Farm, not sell off an additional parcel or crowd the farm with uses that impede the farms' use for agriculture.
"Few people have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder." - George Washington

   

 
THERE ARE MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PATTERSON FARM'S ACQUISION BY LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP IN A CONTROVERSIAL CONDEMNATION BY EMINENT DOMAIN THAT HAS UNSETTLED TOWNSHIP RESIDENTS SINCE IT OCCURRED. NOW THE TOWNSHIP IS PUSHING FORWARD WITH PLANS TO SELL A PARCEL AND BUILD ON FARMLAND...here are a few of the many questions the public would like answers to:

*Why were the elderly Pattersons subjected to numerous uninvited "visits" over a period of many years, by township officials who repeatedly "asked" them to sell their farm to the township? Was it coercion that finally made the Pattersons agree to "sell" their farm for far less than it's market value? (See the Timeline below)

*Why did the township condemn Patterson Farm, a farm within an Agricultural Security District, without the approval of the state Agricultural Lands Condemnation Approval Board? Was it a "rush" to condemnation that made the township avoid this important opportunity for third party review?

*Why did the former Chairman of the Board of Supervisors publicly deny at a Board of Supervisors meeting that the township used Eminent Domain to obtain Patterson Farm? After the Eminent Domain condemnation documents were obtained by citizens through the Freedom Of Information Act, why is the township now "spinning" their story  with the ridiculous claim that the Pattersons requested condemnation of their farm to save money on taxes? And didn't the township save money on their transfer tax too by condemning the farm?

*Citizens voted by ballot referendum in favor of preservation, why are township officials dismantling the farm by subdividing off the Satterthwaite farmhouse, barn and agricultural outbuildings that support the lands' continuing use for growing food crops? 

*How was the township able to subdivide an Act 319-enrolled farm, resulting in a 5.1 acre parcel that is no longer used for farming, without triggering a 7 year rollback tax penalty?

*Of the 3 tenants who lease Patterson Farm property, why is the farmer the only tenant who pays market-rate rent, and who was required to submit a sealed bid to obtain the use of the land? Why do the two other tenants pay no rent or less than market rent? Is it because those tenants were shown favor by township officials? Why did InYourPrimeOnline.com report "the supervisors gave their blessing for the group [tenants] to creep in through the back door?"

*Why is the township ignoring the R-1 (residential) zoning of the Patterson Farm by allowing Commercial use in the rental of the Patterson residence and stone tenant cottage? Is the township ushering in Commercial use on the farm for a reason? Why did supervisor McLaughlin defend the Commercial rental of the residentially zoned homes by stating,
"Farming IS Commerical use?" 

*
Why has the township been so slow to apply for a Conservation Easement to protect the taxpayers $7.2M  investment in the Patterson Farm, and generate $2M in funds to perpetually maintain the farm? (Federal, state, and local funds were pooled to "purchase" the farm). When pressed by the public for a reason why the township has stonewalled the Farmland Preservation application process, why did the township manager say the application would take "several months" for the township grant writer to fill out? The simple 4-page form should take less than a day to complete. The basic information requested is easily available to the township staff. (Click on the Preservation Application page to read the form).

*Why did township officials neglect the maintenance of Patterson Farm, despite being given nearly half a million dollars by PennDot when Patterson Farm land was condemned for the reconstruction of the I-95 exit loop?

*Rent from the farmland has produced in excess of $200,000 in income. Why has the township refused to establish a Patterson Farm Preservation fund, as citizens have requested? Why won't the township produce receipts for maintenance they claim was done at the farm?

*Why did the township allow the roof on Satterthwaite house to leak for 9 years before they repaired it at great expense? Why did the township evict a rent paying tenant from the Satterthwaite house, then let the homes' heater run dry of oil in winter, resulting in damage to the taxpayer-owned property?

*Why are township officials inviting in a company from NYC to build a business on taxpayer-owned Patterson land that will compete with local farmers? Is it because the developer is a close friend of someone on the Board of Supervisors?

*What was the REAL intention of the township when they condemned Patterson Farm? And will they preserve it now, for future generations of food crop growth? Why has former supervisor Godshalk spoken out in protest of the proposed building project on farmland? Will township officials give their friends special deals and dismantle the irreplaceable farm to cover losses created by poor management decisions in other matters within the township?

*How will the anticipated PA Supreme Court ruling in another Eminent Domain dispute affect the preservation of the Patterson Farm? The township condemned the Dalgewicz farm, paying less than fair market value to the landowners, and built a golf course on the land. A legal battle ensued over land value. The case was heard by the PA Supreme Court earlier this year. The golf course was projected to provide taxpayers with $1.5M income annually but instead finished 2011 financially in the red.

Taxpayers throughout Pennsylvania want to know, was the acquisition of the Patterson Farm by the township of Lower Makefield just an ABUSE OF EMINENT DOMAIN? What about the Patterson's rights as landowners to preserve their farm as they saw fit, without the coercion of the township?

The fate of the farm remains to be seen. Please help preserve it! 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
THE FARM WAS NOT FOR SALE.
Timeline -
Patterson Farm history and events that led to condemnation.

 

1917 – Marcus Doan purchased Satterthwaite Farm, in Lower Makefield Township, Bucks County, PA adjacent to the Yardley Farm. He grew oats, corn, barley, wheat, hay, potatoes, apples, tomatoes, carrots, & rutabagas, and raised chickens. He farmed with 2 teams of horses, and later a Farmall 1020 tractor.

Late 1930s – Duane Doan Sr. and his wife Ida Doan moved with their children, including their son Duane Jr., to the Yardley Farm.  They farmed there until 1941 when they moved to Marcus Doan’s adjacent farm in the house now known as Satterthwaite house. They enjoyed success in the first year farming there and bought a Farmall F12 with cultivator. The family later grew to seven children who all helped out on the farm.

Late 1940s – To escape encroaching development Thomas & Alice Patterson sold their farm in Fall Township, PA and purchased the Yardley farm. They began nearly 5 decades of farming in Lower Makefield Township.  They grew asparagus, cabbage, potatoes, horseradish, and cantaloupes to sell. Mr. Patterson planted an extensive garden of fruit trees & bushes and vegetables for their household consumption. He kept precise records of crop rotation and farming methods. He earned a reputation for producing excellent crops that needed no advertisement and were purchased by buyers throughout the Northeast states. Mrs. Patterson was an adept bookkeeper and business woman who managed the household and farm record keeping. Duane Doan Jr. (aka Buster), now a young man, was hired by the Pattersons to drive truck & farm, in addition to his work on the Doan farm.  It was the beginning of a working relationship that would last nearly 50 years,

1960 – The Pattersons purchased the Doan farm and re-joined the two farms, which were part of the original Janney land grant from William Penn.

Late 1960’s – Construction of Interstate 95 split the Patterson farm in two, leaving several acres inaccessible for farming. Heavy construction dust from the building of I-95 settled into the growing cabbage plants on the remaining acreage, making the crop unfit for sale. After that, Mr. Patterson switched to growing corn, soybeans, wheat, rye, barley, squash and pumpkins. 

1973 – Mr. Patterson, age 70,  agreed to truck a few loads of leaves from the Lower Makefield Township municipal building to the farm. The leaves had been piling up for a few years and the township needed a place to dispose of them. In the ensuing years, as rampant development took over the township, former farm fields were built upon and landscaped with trees that grew and produced an increasing volume of leaves annually. For leaf disposal services, Patterson was paid a small annual fee. This agreement continued for the remaining years of his life. As leaf volume increased, Patterson Farm saved the township millions of dollars in landfill, shipping, maintenance, and labor fees up to the present day.

Mid 1980s into the 1990s – Township representatives began to repeatedly approach the Patterson’s about selling the farm to the township. The Pattersons declined, as they always did when developers offered to buy the farm.  The farm was NOT for sale. When the township phoned Mr. Patterson to request a sale, he ignored their calls. When township representatives drove to the farm, Mr. Patterson refused to stop his tractor to speak with them. The township persisted, phoning Buster’s house to implore him to have Mr. Patterson call them. The farm was NOT for sale, but township officials would not take “no” for an answer. Previous township staff who had a better understanding of agriculture had gradually been replaced over the years by those with more aggressive urban attitudes.  The situation had become uncomfortable for the Pattersons. Mr. Patterson was reluctant to ask for an increased fee to take the township’s leaves because he feared the township would take his farm.

1995 – The township used Eminent Domain to acquire another local family farm in order to build a township-owned golf course. It’s a condemnation that was viewed with disdain by many in the general public who felt the township’s abuse of power was not justified. Many residents thought a golf course was a frivolous expenditure of the taxpayers funds. Farmers viewed the use of Eminent Domain as discriminatory against their rights as landowners, and wondered whose farm would be next. The controversial condemnation resulted in a lengthy lawsuit. Key points in the case are land valuation and the landowners assertion that the township "rushed" to condemnation before the landowners could carry out their own plans for their property. The case was recently heard by the PA Supreme Court.  Will the township owe the landowners an additional payment for their property? A verdict is expected in 2012.

June 1997 – At 94 years of age Mr. Patterson enrolled his farm in the Agricultural Security District, a safeguard that was meant to protect farmers from nuisance laws, and to provide an extra layer of protection in the event of a proposed condemnation by requiring the approval of the state Agricultural Lands Condemnation Approval Board. It was a required step toward a Conservation Easement and it turned out to be Mr. Patterson’s last ditch effort to ensure his farm stayed in agriculture.

March 1998 – After years of mounting pressure from the township to sell, the Pattersons signed a “Settlement Agreement” which reads, “Whereas, the Township is desirous of securing by condemnation…”  It does not say the Sellers desired to sell. 

June 1998 – The township condemned the Patterson’s beloved farm with a Declaration of Taking “in accordance with the provisions of the Eminent Domain Code…”

Mr. Patterson turned 95 on June 11th of 1998. He said he was “too old to fight.”  The township’s relentless pursuit had worn him down. After the Settlement the township wanted to commemorate their so-called “saving” of the farm with a group photograph featuring the township staff and the farmers. The Pattersons wanted no part of the publicity-stunt photo op. The township had obtained a place to continue dumping their leaves, but for the elderly Pattersons it was not a day of celebration.  They were paid much less than their land was worth, and several times less than they had already turned down. Money was not their primary motivation, a fact the township officials did not understand.  Although the Pattersons did retain a lifetime right, it was an emotionally upsetting event in what should have been their time to quietly enjoy the few remaining years of life together, reminiscing about the life they had lived and the good work they had accomplished together on the farm.

When Mrs. Patterson, age 89 at the time of the "settlement", was asked if she was pleased with the deal she and her husband received from the township, she replied, “No, but we have to do what they say.”  She once remarked to a local newspaper columnist that she thought the township officials were “Communists.”  In her later years she kept abreast of local newspaper reports covering the township’s handling of issues pertaining to the farm. A family friend remembers her stating, “They’ll ruin the farm.”

August 16, 2000 – Thomas Patterson passed away at the age of 97.

August 25, 2005 – Alice Patterson passed away at the age of 96.

2011 – The controversial township-owned golf course finished the year financially in the red. With no revenue, where will the township raise funds to cover their losses? Will they sell the golf course?

April 2012 – Less than a dozen years after Thomas Pattersons death, the township has subdivided the Act 319-enrolled Patterson Farm, the precious farm with soils of “Statewide Importance” that is located within the Agricultural Security District, and was supposed to be protected from condemnation by Agricultural Lands Condemnation Approval Board review. The Board never heard the Patterson Farm case. The township somehow bypassed the requirement and now plans to sell off a 5.1 acre parcel that includes the Satterthwaite house, barn and agricultural outbuildings, despite public outcry that the structures will be needed by future resident-farmers.

Plans are in place to build a commercial complex on the Patterson’s irreplaceable farm soils, with more projects to come. The township is now making the absurd claim that the Pattersons requested condemnation to save money on their taxes.

The townships's outrageous claim is an insult to the memory of the Pattersons who only wanted to be left alone in their sunset years to exercise their rights as landowners to convey the property they owned and worked so hard for, as they wished. When pressed to give up ownership of their beautful farm, the Pattersons hoped to pass on their legacy for future generations of farmers. The Patterson's wishes have been trampled on by the Lower Makefield Township officials who see only dollar signs when they look at the magnificent farm.

Unless the township's plans are stopped, Mrs. Patterson will be proven right,  the township will “ruin the farm.”

Please act NOW to help permanently preserve Patterson Farm. Your emails, calls and letters are needed immediately. Time is short, plans are in place to sell a farm parcel and build on fertile farmland. They must be stopped.
 

Please call Lower Makefield Township at 267-274-1100 and tell the Township Manager you SUPPORT a Conservation Easement to permanently preserve Patterson Farm, and OPPOSE subdivison of, and construction on, Patterson farmland. There is NO protective covenant on the majority of the farm, without a Conservation Easement there will be NO permanent preservation for the irreplaceable Patterson Farm. Please call or send an email today.  Thank you.

 The opinions expressed within this website are my own opinions, not the opinions of my family members who are employed by Lower Makefield Township.  I hope their employment is not jeopardized by my words here.  I am compelled to speak out before the Patterson Farm is divided up and sold off in pieces, irreparably damaging it's future agricultural use. It is time to permanently preserve the magnificent and irreplaceable Patterson Farm. America loses nearly 2 acres of farm and ranchland per minute. A staggering loss to our nation's food security.  Visitors to this site are encouraged to browse the website, read about the history and importance of the Patterson Farm, and leave your comments about, or remembrances of, the Pattersons and their farm in the Guestbook.

Email me at  
Admin@pattersonfarmpreservation.com   Thank you for visiting the  website.
                                                                                                                                                  Donna Doan


Let's continue Mr. and Mrs. Patterson's legacy of excellence, and pass on something meaningful to benefit future generations.   

Web Hosting Companies